Thursday, December 5, 2013

Week Five EOC: Apple v. Samsung



In the early 1980's, the internet was in its infancy. It was regarded as a way that would change and connect the world, and it has, but at what cost? Before the internet, people relied on other methods to receive the news and other information, such as books, television, newspapers, magazines and radio. Nowadays, computers are found almost everywhere, with internet access right alongside it, to instantly be able to access any information you are seeking. While the majority of people who use the internet for entertainment purposes, business, and school or even to talk to family members across the country or even the world, there are people who use it for more sinister purposes, and has made for a melting pot of nefarious agendas.
Since its invention, the internet has been host to new breeds of criminals, and often times are never caught or prosecuted. The knowledge of these crimes has changed the ways in which you use the internet. In the ways that parents have taught their children to be cautious about strangers in the real world, it should be even more so instilled when regarding the internet in any way, shape or form. “Predators and scam artists know how to utilize the latest technology. Real crime runs rampant in the virtual world,” said NAAG President and Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who made this topic the focus of his one-year presidential term. (www.naag.org). Children and teenagers make up one of the largest groups of internet users; this makes it easier for predators to prey upon them. It is often because they are young, trusting, curious and naive that they are perfect targets, and with the added danger that it provides the predator with anonymity.

Several laws have been made to try and protect children from predators. In fact the President of the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) is making it his focus for the Initiative Summit. “Unfortunately, as technology advances, online sexual predators find new ways to prey on our children,” President Bruning said. “As Internet access becomes more and more ‘wireless’ and allows people to move around, it becomes harder to track down and prosecute these offenders.” (www.naag.org) they have also been working on two goals: hastening the law enforcement subpoena process and removing child pornography from the internet. The Communication Decency Act (CDA) was passed in 1996, and it made it illegal to put “indecent” material where children could access it on the internet but the Supreme Court found that the term “indecent” was found to be too vague. Following the CDA was The Child Online Protection Act (COPA), in 1998, which was a narrower version of the CDA, where sites required proof of age before giving access to users. It was challenged and in 1999 they was a permanent injunction against its enforcement.

While there are many positive attributes to the internet there are also slightly darker attributes as well. As with everything in life and the worlds around us, for every day there is a night, for every good thing in the world there is something waiting in the wings to cause harm or to use it in a way it was never intended for. We have to educate our children more and tell them about all potential dangers and not just gloss over them because it may be uncomfortable. “Together, we can bring emerging trends to the forefront, be diligent in our efforts to harness new technology and limit the crime and corruption that come with it,” said President Bruning. (www.naag.org)

Week Nine EOC: Used Cars

1. Attempted murder.
2. Assault with a deadly weapon.
3. Tampering with witnesses.
4. Perjury.
5. Fleeing the scene of an accident.

Week Ten EOC: Lawyer Jokes

1.

Q: How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?

A1: Three; one to do it and two to sue him for malpractice.


A1: It only takes one lawyer to change your light bulb to his light bulb.

A2: You won't find a lawyer who can change a light bulb. Now, if you're looking for a lawyer to screw a light bulb...

A3: Whereas the party of the first part, also known as "Lawyer", and the party of the second part, also known as "Light Bulb", do hereby and forthwith agree to a transaction wherein the party of the second part (Light Bulb) shall be removed from the current position as a result of failure to perform previously agreed upon duties, i.e., the lighting, elucidation, and otherwise illumination of the area ranging from the front (north) door, through the entryway, terminating at an area just inside the primary living area, demarcated by the beginning of the carpet, any spillover illumination being at the option of the party of the second part (Light Bulb) and not required by the aforementioned agreement between the parties.

The aforementioned removal transaction shall include, but not be limited to, the following steps:

1.) The party of the first part (Lawyer) shall, with or without elevation at his option, by means of a chair, stepstool, ladder or any other means of elevation, grasp the party of the second part (Light Bulb) and rotate the party of the second part (Light Bulb) in a counter-clockwise direction, this point being non-negotiable.

2.) Upon reaching a point where the party of the second part (Light Bulb) becomes separated from the party of the third part ("Receptacle"), the party of the first part (Lawyer) shall have the option of disposing of the party of the second part (Light Bulb) in a manner consistent with all applicable state, local and federal statutes.

3.) Once separation and disposal have been achieved, the party of the first part (Lawyer) shall have the option of beginning installation of the party of the fourth part ("New Light Bulb"). This installation shall occur in a manner consistent with the reverse of the procedures described in step one of this self-same document, being careful to note that the rotation should occur in a clockwise direction, this point also being non-negotiable.

NOTE: The above described steps may be performed, at the option of the party of the first part (Lawyer), by any or all persons authorized by him, the objective being to produce the most possible revenue for the party of the fifth part, also known as "Partnership." 


2.

Q: How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?

A: Fifty four. Eight to argue, one to get a continuance, one to object, one to demur, two to research precedents, one to dictate a letter, one to stipulate, five to turn in their time cards, one to depose, one to write interrogatories, two to settle, one to order a secretary to change the bulb, and twenty-eight to bill for professional services.  


3.

A man who had been caught embezzling millions from his employer went to a lawyer seeking defense. He didn’t want to go to jail. But his lawyer told him, "Don’t worry. You’ll never have to go to jail with all that money.” And the lawyer was right. When the man was sent to prison, he didn’t have a dime. 

4.

A lawyer named Impos Syble was shopping for a tombstone. After he had made his selection, the stonecutter asked him what inscription he would like on it.

"Here lies an honest man and a lawyer," responded the lawyer.

"Sorry, but I can't do that," replied the stonecutter. "In this state, it's against the law to bury two people in the same grave. However, I could put `here lies an honest lawyer'."

"But that won't let people know who it is!" protested the lawyer.

"Sure it will," retorted the stonecutter. "People will read it and exclaim, "That's impossible!"


5.
 
Why was the lawyer skimming the Bible right before he died?

He was looking for loopholes!